Additional Studies Into Ape Language And Primate Intelligence

Additional Studies Into Ape Language And Primate Intelligence

Duane Rumbaugh, Sue Savage-Rumbaugh and Bill Fields

An overview of language research with apes during the last 50 years provides strong evidence for their use of words (manual gestures or graphic patterns) as meaningful symbols that refer to things and their qualities (temperature, color, etc.) persons or peers, activities, or as places for foods, rest, chasing, and so on.

Apes can also comprehend new sentences with fairly complex structures. They can use language to achieve outcomes that they would otherwise not be able to achieve, for example to formulate names for new items based on novel word combinations. They can use manual signs and graphic symbols to communicate about things that are not present; they can learn to communicate their needs and to fulfill one another’s requests for specific tools, foods, and games; they can integrate their language skills and apply them creatively even several years later in new contexts. If reared in a manner that approximates child rearing, apes can come to understand complex human speech and its syntax.

Language acquisition using lexigrams is optimized if it occurs in the course of social rearing in an environment that is language structured. Ideally, this provides a running vocal narrative to the apes as infants, describing what things are, what is about to happen, and so on; this narrative should be integrated with the use of graphic symbols that are to function as words. Results show that apes can enter the language domain as a result of human rearing and instruction, although their capacity for language is much more limited than that of humans. A great deal remains to be learned. Future research promises to continue to blur the boundary between the basic principles of human and animal learning, language, symbolic function, and complex behaviors.

The following summaries of three significant research projects in the study of the cognitive development of primates are excerpted from Animal Bodies, Human Minds, by W.A. Hillix and Duane Rumbaugh (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2004).

Previous

Additional Ape Language Research Programs

The Koko Project, Koko with Mr. Rodgers

The Koko Project:

Changing Our Perceptions About Gorilla Intelligence

Koko has done for gorillas what Washoe has done for chimpanzees and Kanzi for bonobos; she has demonstrated that her species is capable of a level of comprehension and production of language that was not thought possible. Researcher Dr. Penny Patterson began working with the one year old Koko in 1972. Rather than adopting Gardner’s sign-only technique used with Washoe, Patterson exposed Koko simultaneously to signing and vocal translations of the signed message. After two weeks of training, Koko had imitated the signs for “food” and “water.” From that point on, she learned a sign a month, and after 18 months of training Koko knew 21 signs. At age three, Koko met Patterson’s criterion of acceptance for 78 signs. After 51 months, Koko knew 161 signs. Koko’s vocabulary grew to 200 signs by the time she was a little over five years old.

Controlled testing of Koko’s comprehension indicated that her comprehension of sign was almost precisely matched by her comprehension of English. Her comprehension increased slightly when messages were delivered simultaneously in sign and vocal language. Patterson tested Koko’s comprehension by administering the Assessment of Children’s Language Comprehension. Koko’s answers ranged from a low of 30 percent to a high of 72 percent correct; chance levels of responding range from 20 to 25 percent. Koko’s accuracy was below that of both normal and handicapped children, but was generally well above the chance level.

The simultaneous use of English and signs also enabled Koko to rhyme, indicating at least she recognized similarilities in sound. In addition, Koko invented unique combinations of signs, for example, “eye hat” for a mask. “Conversations with Koko,” which demonstrated her use of language, was a regular feature in Gorilla, the journal of the Gorilla Foundation. There is no question that Koko’s contributions have forever changed our view of all nonhuman animals. We no longer think of gorillas as fearsome and aggressive beasts, nor as less intelligent than chimpanzees. Koko illustrates one of the highly significant reasons for the study of animal language in that it provides a window on the feelings and thought processes of our fellow travelers on planet Earth.

Support

Great Ape Trust

Forest of Hope

Please support the continued care and well-being of our unique bonobo family.

$
Video Gallery
Tree